He was not especially well known among the American public and few people had an emotional attachment to his legacy.
However, this changed abruptly when a Broadway musical about his life came out and become massively popular. By total coincidence, this play creates a flood of interest in Hamilton right at the time the currency decisions are being made and makes replacing his portrait politically complicated. The reporters say that the Treasury has total control over the release of currency, so the simpler solution is just to change the schedule, but they apparently ignore that suggestion. This is likely an effort to head off the complaints of traditionalists, but is seen here as an unfortunate attempt to avoid taking a real stand.
In the title text Randall reiterates that this is a rare case in politics in which there's a clear and simple solution. The Treasury has the authority to redesign currency, and a petition to Congress could change the release schedule to fit their needs. That makes all the compromises and backtracking unnecessary: Randall appears frustrated with the artificial constraints that are holding back what should be a simple and straightforward process although he does acknowledge that it takes time to evaluate the security of a redesign's resistance to counterfeiting.
Randall seems to be using this as an example of the outdated and frankly strange design of American currency, the implication that using that on all US dollar bills would constitute giving up on ever having a design relevant to the modern world. Also by replacing all portraits with this image, there would no longer be any gender controversy. The weird creepy looking eye thing is the Eye of Providence.
And now that Randall mentioned it, I somehow have an intense emotional need to see a series of US currency with the Eye of Providence as the featured portrait on every bill There is no rush here, so long as it is done. There's been a furor over here in the UK about losing a woman from our paper money.
Not the Queen, at least not just yet, although having just turned And I couldn't help feeling that the fallout from the referendum, if not other events, might easily make this matter moot.
What is the "Security" issue referred to in the title text? I don't get what all the fuss is about what picture is on the money. I don't even know what picture is on any of the euro bills. If this is a valid claim, could someone point more explicitly to where the Act restricts the order in which bills can be redesigned? This whole controversy is one reason why there are no real objects on the Euro notes.
- dating an engineer guy!
- 21 year old guy dating 14 year old!
- one tree hill stars dating real life!
- best XKCD images on Pinterest | Funny memes, Entertaining and Hilarious memes.
The individual nation's currencies did have real persons including women - at least in Germany or real "things" in a wider sense on them and changing them was often as complicated as depicted here. The current pictures on the Euro notes represent specific architectural styles e. Gothic or Baroque , but the buildings and facades shown don't exist.
I don't know if this should be part of the explanation as a side note or something, but I felt it would be nice to know, that other states or organisiations had similar struggles and actually found a compromise. Can we add a category about Comics Featuring Steve? I have very little information as to which parts of this comic are true or false. This page could seriously do with citations.
I have no idea. One thing I feel the need to add here is that the Trail of Tears was a human rights violation due to the chiefs, not due to Andrew Jackson.
While it still wasn't exactly the morally right thing to do, relocating the tribes along the Trail, the chiefs did not include their slaves in the "census" they gave to the army, resulting in a huge supply shortage. Had the chiefs considered their tribes' slaves people and counted them in the number that was given to Jackson and the army, the Trail of Tears would have been a Trail of Discomfort and Frustration instead.
It's 'cause you're dumb. I get that there are security reasons for the schedule, but this is like the ONE problem we have where the right answer is both easy and straightforward. If we can't figure it out, maybe we should just give up and just replace all the portraits on the bills with that weird pyramid eye thing.
- dating with hsv 1 oral!
- ?
- 1672: Women on 20s.
- dating på nett for gifte!
- The breakthrough in that xkcd graphic.
- ?
Explanation [ edit ] This comic portrays a series of press conferences with a US Treasury spokesperson different from Cueball in the first panel as he has a bit of hair. The other two women he chooses are: Eleanor Roosevelt an American politician, diplomat, and activist. Roosevelt 's four terms in office. She became the runner-up in the vote. Rachel Carson , a pioneering environmentalist who is most famous for her book Silent Spring.
Transcript [ edit ] [Cueball is sitting at his laptop. Above him is the text he reads on the screen, then he speaks, and below that text is the list of women from his computer showing his three picks, each with a gray "drop-down menu" triangle to the right of the names. Below this is his final spoken line. At the top of the panel is a small frame breaking the top left border with a caption: Vote for your three picks: Tubman for 1, definitely.
Navigation menu
On the front of the lectern the top part of the image inside the seal for the department of treasury is visible inside a circle, showing the scales and the tip of the triangular band beneath it. The rest of this image is hidden below the panel frame.
This is a great cartoon and it does all the good things. But it is also an example of using our past in a way that reinforces harmful misconceptions. It is my duty to point that out and ask that my colleagues interested in climate change but who themselves are not experts in paleoanthropology and prehistory, as well as cartoonists, learn about this widespread and important problem that we have in formal education and public information. If there was a great cartoon or graphic that made an important point about education, for example, but threw some basic physics under the bus in so doing, I wager you would ask for that to be fixed, since getting the physics right does not damage the message, and getting it wrong damages general understanding of physics especially in a widely disseminated product.
Dating Pools - explain xkcd
And you would be right to do so, and I'd likely agree with you. Here, however, what is being damaged is not esoteric knowledge that only the experts really need to know, but widespread conceptions that ultimately underscore privilege- and racism-driven thinking and action that ultimately hurts people.
That is something that should be considered. I'm pretty convinced that you are not actually seeing my arguments, but rather, preconceived them and are tilting at a straw man. Greg, I asked you to propose alternative events and your answer was vague. I'd love to engage you on this but you don't seem to get that I simply don't understand what you are saying.
If you want to mark points in time, imperial triumphs and technological breakthroughs serve well. Further, Randal has gone some lengths to escape the Western narrative as far as I can see. So I would like you to propose which events should be, corrected, which removed, and which added, while otherwiase preserving the design which you like. Just saying you don't like what is there is not helping the rest of us understand what it is you are concerned about.
Thomas Fuller, you are amazing While I'm very happy about the xkcd graphic, I always managed to get its point across without it, usually by slamming the table and saying "bang, that's what's happening right now on a geological timescale". Now it seems here we got a case where even a graphic graphic doesn't help.
1628: Magnus
My browser still has http: Hahaha, but one of the blogs missing there is I didn't take Greg Laden's post as a criticism of the idea. It is sad that we cannot tolerate complexity even amongst ourselves. I read that he was very much in favor of it but thought it could be improved. I haven't had time to look at the detail, but in a differently designed world it would be possible to introduce some tweaks no more than tweaks that would represent a broader historical perspective. Given the job involved, xkcd's result is no less than spectacular.
Though I joined him in this comment, since I've been looking at history lately, I do understand that a finished work of art - and this is a finished work of art - is not so easily revised after publication and dissemination. The big idea is so important and its hopeful audience should get the real message, which is not diluted by this quibble. It's an interesting area for thought, which human manipulations have resulted in how much climate change where. Empire building, exploitation and colonization resulted in massive deforestation over the last years possibly longer. There would be a clutter problem in that bit as well, since it's short relative to the whole.
Oh for time to indulge these diversions. But I'm trying to get some painting done amidst the constant temptation to correct people "wrong on the internet. I don't think I can't tolerate complexity. I am simply admitting that I do not see what Greg is complaining about, and asking him what a revision would look like, whether it is worth doing or not.
I will ask you too. If there's something Eurocentric about the timeline, about which I'm unconvinced, how would you fix it? In my life and in our election, one huuuge problem is perfectionism and idealism getting in the way of calling out real problems and making the adjustments to real life all humans must. You couldn't have told me this before I turned 60, I wouldn't have believed you.
But "purity" is actually not a good thing. We need a little dirt in our lives. And again, like Greg Laden, despite my quibble, it is impossible not to praise xkcd's beautiful and well thought out visual. You appear not to acknowledge this, why? I did mention, didn't I, that I need to do some painting and time is limited? Yes, I shouldn't say so much if I'm not ready to back it up, but I have two suggestions.
One is Greg Laden's excellent article and responses to comments: What is disturbing is that the more I look at history, the more the global predations of "civilization" which wasted vast swathes of the globe in the last millenium seem more the norm than the exception. I am concerned that we take a piecemeal view of the scale of global deforestation and the like. Our self-centeredness is supported by Genesis which states in unequivocal terms that the earth is put there for us to plunder. This will not end well. But all this is beside the point, which is that xkcd's graphic is Now Gregory Laden's criticism and Susan's last comment provoke me to go out on a limb and do some of the amateurish wrong Greg complains about Deforestation is as old as civilization, i.